| |
|
|
9/22/2010 5:51:30 PM
|
|
I loved it
|
|
I loved this article. I don't understand why some of you ladies are so insecure that you are accusing this article of being sexist. Its simply saying 'hey, this is some easy stuff he can do to help instead of just watching every one else buss around.' I loved it, it helps to be aware of some more 'masculine' jobs that need to be done, that the groom would be more comfortable handling. Good job on a helpful and informative article Ourweddingday.com.
|
|
|
|
9/14/2010 9:10:46 PM
|
|
Calm Down
|
|
I think you all are over reacting too. It is just telling of ways to get your guy involved in planing your wedding. But hey if you want to do it all yourself, then you have no right to complain about it later.
|
|
|
|
9/11/2010 7:23:56 PM
|
|
Calm Down
|
|
I think you all are over reacting too. The article doesn't say that men know more about electronics then woman it just says they "tend to know a lot about music and stereo equipment" geeze girls calm down! This article is just giving ideas of what a grooms can help with. Traditionally men don't help with a lot of the planning. My fiancee is more hands on but I think this is great for others who may not be. There is nothing sexist about this article why don't you read it right!
|
|
|
|
9/7/2010 2:42:50 PM
|
|
I don't see the problem
|
|
I think you guys are really over-reacting. The article is not 'setting anyone back 50 years'; it does not state or even imply that women are incapable or less capable of selecting music or anything else. It is about helping some guys who may view wedding planning (incorrectly) as a "girly" activity, by highlighting some traditionally "manly" aspects of it. It's about making it easier for some guys, who don't know where to begin, to get involved.
|
|
|
|
9/3/2010 12:28:06 PM
|
|
|
|
I agree with the bride below, this article was VERY offensive to me. Thanks for setting us back 50 years OurWeddingDay.com instead of empowering us. Didn't know my fiancé was supposed to know more about stereo equipment than me (?)
|
|
| |